After 5 years of doing live talk on a Nor Cal AM/FM station Lou Binninger is now using No Hostages Radio to give his take on the local, state, and national political and cultural scene.

Weekly radio episodes will appear here as well as articles written for the Territorial Dispatch.

The Controversial PCR Test

All Americans should now be familiar with the sight of a medical professional clothed in protective attire inserting a probe deep into someone’s nose. That is the first step of the PCR test to detect the presence of Covid 19, dead or alive.

The PCR or Polymerase Chain Reaction test uses a swab on a probe to obtain DNA. It allows scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail. The PCR process was invented in 1983 by the American biochemist Kary Mullis at Cetus Corporation. Mullis, now dead, never claimed that his test could do what it is being used for. 

That aside, the current testing accuracy has been called into question. Depending on the level of amplification it could show positive for Covid that is wrong more than 90% of the time. And even when accurate it could detect Covid if you had symptoms or you felt fine. It could tell if you had a Covid bout in the past or even if you never experienced symptoms because your immune system stopped the illness.

After nearly two years of the PCR being misused to promote a “daily cases” propaganda campaign to scare the population to death or just make them compliant the Centers for Disease Control has declared PCR a flawed testing model.

In addition, medical whistleblowers are now saying that the PCR swabs contain Ethylene Oxide (EO), a cancer causing chemical. So, the probe is being pushed deep into the subject’s nasal cavity and depositing EO? Some swab packaging listed the substance as Ethylene Oxide or just EO. These swabs were made in China.

U.S. government literature says that lymphoma and leukemia are the cancers most frequently reported to be associated with occupational exposure to EO. Stomach and breast cancers may also be associated with EO exposure.

The National Cancer Institute says “at room temperature, ethylene oxide is a flammable colorless gas with a sweet odor. It is used primarily to produce other chemicals, including antifreeze. In smaller amounts, ethylene oxide is used as a pesticide and a sterilizing agent. The ability of ethylene oxide to damage DNA makes it an effective sterilizing agent but also accounts for its cancer-causing activity.”

“The primary routes of human exposure to EO are inhalation and ingestion, which may occur through occupational, consumer, or environmental exposure. Because EO is highly explosive and reactive, the equipment used for its processing generally consists of tightly closed and highly automated systems, which decreases the risk of occupational exposure.”

“Despite these precautions, workers and people who live near industrial facilities that produce or use EO may be exposed to EO through uncontrolled industrial emissions. The general population may also be exposed through tobacco smoke and the use of products that have been sterilized with ethylene oxide, such as medical products, cosmetics, and beekeeping equipment.”

Medical product manufacturers agree with the U.S. government’s description of EO but say the swabs used for PCR tests are treated with EO to sterilize them and are not hazardous. 

EO was first developed in the early 19th century but wasn't commonly used as a chemical sterilizer in health care settings until the 1950s. The process involves exposing a medical product, like a nasal swab, to the gas while it's in a chamber and then aerating, or "air washing," for several hours to remove any residual traces of ethylene oxide, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

By the time the nasal swab has been fully aerated and is ready for packaging, "there's likely hardly a trace of (ethylene oxide) remaining," Stuart Batterman, an environmental health sciences professor at the University of Michigan attests.

When we talk about informed consent on medical procedures there are still huge areas left to trusting the medical / political industry. Millions of employees are now being required to test weekly if they decline the gene therapy shot. Hopefully the professor’s evaluation of EO residue is accurate.

(Lou Binninger can be heard on No Hostages Radio podcast, live on KMYC 1410AM 10-1 Saturdays, read at Live with Lou on Facebook and at Nohostagesradio.com)


###

Swine Flu Debacle 1976

Coronavirus Trials Needed