When it comes to voter fraud and stealing elections democrats certainly have the reputation for it. Dogs and dead people voting, slogans like vote early and vote often, and ballot box stuffing are infamously remembered along with the Chicago Democratic Machine and New York’s Tammany Hall.
Chicago is noted for helping President John F. Kennedy "steal" the 1960 election. JFK beat Richard Nixon by 9,000 votes in Illinois by capturing what some considered a suspiciously high 450,000 advantage in Cook County.
Of course, the domestic terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, the Ku Klux Klan believed its mission was to intimidate black people from fully engaging in American society and certainly stop them from voting. Blacks then were nearly all conservative and served in legislatures as far back as the 1800’s (5 did before 1867). Blacks were conservative because democrats were racist and the Party of Slavery.
More recently, democrats scream that no identification (ID) should be required to vote implying that minorities and the poor are too stupid to obtain an ID. Dems say that regulations and IDs are synonymous with voter suppression, but nearly every person needs an ID today to take care of everyday business. There is also no proof that voter registration and absentee ballot laws suppress voting either.
Dems also want citizens of other countries, incarcerated people and felons on parole to vote, and now 16-year-olds. Seems like they just want to control elections through any means possible and eliminate any tracking and accountability that insure the integrity of the election process.
Most people want honest and fair elections, but liberals just want to win them, big difference.
For those doubting the existence of voter fraud see www.heritage.org/voterfraud where Heritage Foundation listed a sampling of 1,199 proven instances, the techniques and prosecution. However, this is trivial compared to what Big Tech Media (Google, Facebook, Twitter etc.) accomplished in the 2016 election for Hillary Clinton.
Remember, Hillary supposedly received 2.87 million more votes nationwide than Trump, a margin of 2.1% (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college). Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states.
However, startling testimony was given recently by Dr. Robert Epstein before a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Big Tech bias. Big Tech is an assembly of private corporations and have a right to be biased you say. True, but Congress granted them immunity from liability lawsuits because they all promise that their mission is to be a neutral public forum.
The Communications Decency Act Section 230 protects these companies from liability for illegal content posted by third parties. The largest and most powerful Internet media companies today have hundreds of thousands of employees. And they have enormous resources and advanced algorithms they can use to moderate content.
Though Big Tech representatives all claim neutrality with straight faces, the evidence is overwhelming that they are completely biased - liberal, pro-abortion, anti-Christian, anti-Trump, anti-law enforcement and anti-military, anti-capitalist and so on.
Who does Big Tech hire? Mainly liberals. Donor records reveal Google employees gave $1.315 million to Hillary and nothing to Trump in 2016. And the number one corporate donor to Hillary was Alphabet, parent company to Google. Big Tech’s hiring is their business but they aren’t a neutral Internet platform.
Dr. Robert Epstein, is an American psychologist, professor, author, and journalist. He earned his Ph.D. in psychology at Harvard University in 1981, was editor in chief of Psychology Today, a visiting scholar at the University of California, San Diego, and the founder and director emeritus of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies in Concord, MA.
Epstein told Senator Ted Cruz at the hearing that he was an outspoken supporter for Clinton and is a hard-core liberal. However, Epstein says he believes in free and fair elections over a candidate or party.
Epstein is an expert on Big Tech’s methodology. He believes Big Tech intends to influence the decision-making of its users and will “hack” the 2020 election. They will utilize the search engine manipulation effect, the search suggestion effect, and the answer bot effect. It is “non-competitive manipulation,” says the professor.
He testified that Google influenced a minimum of 2.6 million to 10.4 million votes for Clinton in 2016. With no big tech manipulation, Trump easily wins the popular vote as well. Epstein further suggested Big Tech was overconfident in 2016 thinking Trump had no chance, but did much better for democrats in 2018.
Twenty million votes could be affected using Google’s search engine bias according to Epstein and that’s just Google, the most powerful business in the world. While liberals claimed that Russians meddled in the 2016 election that was a diversion. The real election hackers are their lefty friends at Big Tech.